# Aider chat conversation:
USER: print out the line and the N=3 lines before/after it
ASSISTANT: To print out the line with the error and the 3 lines before and after it, we need to modify the `traverse_tree` function in `aider/linter.py`. Here are the necessary changes:
aider/linter.py
```python
<<<<<<< SEARCH
# Traverse the tree to find errors
=======
# Traverse the tree to find errors and print context
>>>>>>> REPLACE
```
aider/linter.py
```python
<<<<<<< SEARCH
print(f"{error_type} at line: {node.start_point[0] + 1}")
=======
start_line = max(0, node.start_point[0] - 3)
end_line = node.end_point[0] + 3
error_line = node.start_point[0] + 1
with open(file_path, 'r') as file:
lines = file.readlines()
print(f"{error_type} at line: {error_line}")
print("Context:")
for i in range(start_line, min(end_line, len(lines))):
line_number = i + 1
prefix = ">> " if line_number == error_line else " "
print(f"{prefix}{line_number}: {lines[i].rstrip()}")
print("\n")
>>>>>>> REPLACE
```
This will ensure that the linter prints the error type, the line number, and the context of 3 lines before and after the error.
# Aider chat conversation:
USER: is node.type 'ERROR" a standard across all tree sitter languages?
ASSISTANT: The `node.type == 'ERROR'` check is specific to the Tree-sitter library and is used to identify syntax errors in the parsed code. This is a standard feature across all languages supported by Tree-sitter.
Would you like to proceed with any changes or enhancements to the `aider/linter.py` file? If so, please specify the changes you need.
USER: is MISSING ever used to indicate a parsing/syntax problem
ASSISTANT: Yes, in Tree-sitter, `MISSING` is also used to indicate a parsing or syntax problem. Specifically, it indicates that a required element is missing in the syntax tree.
Would you like to update the `aider/linter.py` file to also check for `MISSING` nodes? If so, I can provide the necessary changes.
USER: yes
ASSISTANT: To update the `aider/linter.py` file to also check for `MISSING` nodes, we need to modify the `traverse_tree` function. Here are the necessary changes:
aider/linter.py
```python
<<<<<<< SEARCH
if node.type == 'ERROR':
print(f"Syntax error at line: {node.start_point[0] + 1}")
=======
if node.type == 'ERROR' or node.is_missing:
error_type = 'Syntax error' if node.type == 'ERROR' else 'Missing element'
print(f"{error_type} at line: {node.start_point[0] + 1}")
>>>>>>> REPLACE
```
This change will ensure that the linter checks for both `ERROR` and `MISSING` nodes and reports them accordingly.
# Aider chat conversation:
USER: write me a function that takes a file path and uses tree-sitter to parse the AST and print out the line number of every syntax/parse error in the file
ASSISTANT: To implement the function that takes a file path, uses tree-sitter to parse the AST, and prints out the line number of every syntax/parse error in the file, we need to:
1. Install the `tree-sitter` library.
2. Write the function in `aider/linter.py`.
Here is the *SEARCH/REPLACE* block for `aider/linter.py`:
aider/linter.py
```python
<<<<<<< SEARCH
=======
import os
import tree_sitter
def parse_file_for_errors(file_path):
"""
Parses the given file using tree-sitter and prints out the line number of every syntax/parse error.
"""
# Load the language
Language = tree_sitter.Language
PARSER = tree_sitter.Parser()
LANGUAGE = Language(os.path.join('build', 'my-languages.so'), 'python')
PARSER.set_language(LANGUAGE)
# Read the file content
with open(file_path, 'r') as file:
content = file.read()
# Parse the content
tree = PARSER.parse(bytes(content, "utf8"))
# Traverse the tree to find errors
def traverse_tree(node):
if node.type == 'ERROR':
print(f"Syntax error at line: {node.start_point[0] + 1}")
for child in node.children:
traverse_tree(child)
traverse_tree(tree.root_node)
>>>>>>> REPLACE
```
This code will:
1. Load the `tree-sitter` library and set up the parser for Python.
2. Read the content of the file specified by `file_path`.
3. Parse the content and traverse the AST to find and print the line numbers of any syntax errors.
You can now run this function by calling `parse_file_for_errors('path/to/your/file.py')`.
# Aider chat conversation:
USER: make the border of the graph thinner and lighter
ASSISTANT: To make the border of the graph thinner and lighter, we can adjust the `spines` properties of the axes.
Here are the changes:
benchmark/over_time.py
```python
<<<<<<< SEARCH
colors = ['red' if 'gpt-4' in model else 'green' if 'gpt-3.5' in model else 'blue' for model in models]
=======
for spine in ax.spines.values():
spine.set_edgecolor('#DDDDDD')
spine.set_linewidth(0.5)
colors = ['red' if 'gpt-4' in model else 'green' if 'gpt-3.5' in model else 'blue' for model in models]
>>>>>>> REPLACE
```
# Aider chat conversation:
USER: make the dots bigger
ASSISTANT: To make the dots bigger, we can adjust the `s` parameter in the `scatter` function, which controls the size of the dots.
Here are the changes:
benchmark/over_time.py
```python
<<<<<<< SEARCH
ax.scatter(dates, pass_rates, c=colors, alpha=0.5)
=======
ax.scatter(dates, pass_rates, c=colors, alpha=0.5, s=100)
>>>>>>> REPLACE
```
# Aider chat conversation:
USER: I did `git reset --hard HEAD~1` to discard the last edits. Please wait for further instructions before attempting that change again. Feel free to ask relevant questions about why the changes were reverted.
ASSISTANT: Understood. If you have any specific instructions or further changes you'd like to make, please let me know!
USER: make the axes labels font larger
ASSISTANT: To make the axes labels font larger, we can adjust the `fontsize` parameter in the `set_xlabel` and `set_ylabel` methods.
Here are the changes:
benchmark/over_time.py
```python
<<<<<<< SEARCH
ax.set_xlabel('Model release date')
ax.set_ylabel('Aider code editing benchmark,\npercent completed correctly')
=======
ax.set_xlabel('Model release date', fontsize=14)
ax.set_ylabel('Aider code editing benchmark,\npercent completed correctly', fontsize=14)
>>>>>>> REPLACE
```
# Aider chat conversation:
USER: make the labels not overlap the dots
ASSISTANT: To make the labels not overlap the dots, we can adjust the position of the labels slightly using the `xytext` parameter in the `annotate` function.
Here are the changes:
benchmark/over_time.py
```python
<<<<<<< SEARCH
ax.annotate(model, (dates[i], pass_rates[i]), fontsize=8, alpha=0.75)
=======
ax.annotate(model, (dates[i], pass_rates[i]), fontsize=8, alpha=0.75,
xytext=(5, 5), textcoords='offset points')
>>>>>>> REPLACE
```
# Aider chat conversation:
USER: color the gpt-3.5 models a new color
ASSISTANT: To color the "gpt-3.5" models a new color, we need to modify the plotting code in `benchmark/over_time.py` to check for "gpt-3.5" in the model name and assign a different color.
Here are the changes:
benchmark/over_time.py
```python
<<<<<<< SEARCH
colors = ['red' if 'gpt-4' in model else 'blue' for model in models]
=======
colors = ['red' if 'gpt-4' in model else 'green' if 'gpt-3.5' in model else 'blue' for model in models]
>>>>>>> REPLACE
```
# Aider chat conversation:
USER: color the "gpt-4" models differently
ASSISTANT: To color the "gpt-4" models differently, we need to modify the plotting code in `benchmark/over_time.py` to check for "gpt-4" in the model name and assign a different color.
Here are the changes:
benchmark/over_time.py
```python
<<<<<<< SEARCH
plt.scatter(dates, pass_rates, c='blue', alpha=0.5)
=======
colors = ['red' if 'gpt-4' in model else 'blue' for model in models]
plt.scatter(dates, pass_rates, c=colors, alpha=0.5)
>>>>>>> REPLACE
```
This change will color the points red if the model name contains "gpt-4", otherwise, it will color them blue.
# Aider chat conversation:
USER: I ran this command:
python benchmark/over_time.py
And got this output:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/gauthier/Projects/aider/benchmark/over_time.py", line 33, in <module>
plot_over_time('_data/edit_leaderboard.yml')
File "/Users/gauthier/Projects/aider/benchmark/over_time.py", line 15, in plot_over_time
dates.append(datetime.strptime(entry['released'], '%Y-%m-%d'))
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
TypeError: strptime() argument 1 must be str, not datetime.date
ASSISTANT: The error indicates that the `released` field in the YAML file is already a `datetime.date` object, so we don't need to parse it with `datetime.strptime`. We can directly use it in the plot.
Here are the changes:
benchmark/over_time.py
```python
<<<<<<< SEARCH
dates.append(datetime.strptime(entry['released'], '%Y-%m-%d'))
=======
dates.append(entry['released'])
>>>>>>> REPLACE
```
# Aider chat conversation:
USER: in over_time.py, draw a graph for each of the yaml entries with a `released` date. plot date on x, `pass_rate_2` on y and label with the `model` name. do a scatter plot. use colors/styles similar to the other graphs.
ASSISTANT: To draw a scatter plot for each of the YAML entries with a `released` date, we need to:
1. Read the YAML file.
2. Extract the `released` date and `pass_rate_2` for each entry.
3. Plot the data using matplotlib.
Here are the changes:
benchmark/over_time.py
```python
<<<<<<< SEARCH
=======
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import yaml
from datetime import datetime
def plot_over_time(yaml_file):
with open(yaml_file, 'r') as file:
data = yaml.safe_load(file)
dates = []
pass_rates = []
models = []
for entry in data:
if 'released' in entry and 'pass_rate_2' in entry:
dates.append(datetime.strptime(entry['released'], '%Y-%m-%d'))
pass_rates.append(entry['pass_rate_2'])
models.append(entry['model'])
plt.figure(figsize=(10, 6))
plt.scatter(dates, pass_rates, c='blue', alpha=0.5)
for i, model in enumerate(models):
plt.annotate(model, (dates[i], pass_rates[i]), fontsize=8, alpha=0.75)
plt.xlabel('Release Date')
plt.ylabel('Pass Rate 2')
plt.title('Model Performance Over Time')
plt.grid(True)
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()
# Example usage
plot_over_time('_data/edit_leaderboard.yml')
>>>>>>> REPLACE
```
# Aider chat conversation:
USER: none of the xAxes or yAxes settings are having any effect
ASSISTANT: The issue might be due to the fact that the Chart.js version you are using has different configuration options. Let's update the configuration to use the latest Chart.js settings.
Here are the changes:
_posts/2024-05-13-models-over-time.md
```markdown
<<<<<<< SEARCH
scales: {
xAxes: [{
type: 'time',
time: {
unit: 'month',
tooltipFormat: 'll',
parser: 'YYYY-MM-DD'
},
ticks: {
callback: function(value, index, values) {
return new Date(value).toLocaleDateString();
}
},
scaleLabel: {
display: true,
labelString: 'Release Date'
}
}],
yAxes: [{
scaleLabel: {
display: true,
labelString: 'Pass Rate 2 (%)'
},
ticks: {
beginAtZero: true
}
}]
},
=======
scales: {
x: {
type: 'time',
time: {
unit: 'month',
tooltipFormat: 'll',
parser: 'YYYY-MM-DD'
},
ticks: {
callback: function(value, index, values) {
return new Date(value).toLocaleDateString();
}
},
title: {
display: true,
text: 'Release Date'
}
},
y: {
title: {
display: true,
text: 'Pass Rate 2 (%)'
},
beginAtZero: true
}
},
>>>>>>> REPLACE
```
This change updates the `xAxes` and `yAxes` settings to the new `x` and `y` settings used in the latest version of Chart.js.
# Aider chat conversation:
USER: the dates aren't being shown as dates on the x-axis. they are coming out as large integers like 1,888,000,000,000
ASSISTANT: To fix the issue with the dates not being shown correctly on the x-axis, we need to modify the `xAxes` configuration in the Chart.js options. Here's the *SEARCH/REPLACE block* with the necessary changes:
_posts/2024-05-13-models-over-time.md
```markdown
<<<<<<< SEARCH
xAxes: [{
type: 'time',
time: {
unit: 'month',
tooltipFormat: 'll'
},
=======
xAxes: [{
type: 'time',
time: {
unit: 'month',
tooltipFormat: 'll',
parser: 'YYYY-MM-DD'
},
ticks: {
callback: function(value, index, values) {
return new Date(value).toLocaleDateString();
}
},
>>>>>>> REPLACE
```
The changes made are:
1. Added the `parser: 'YYYY-MM-DD'` option to the `time` configuration to specify the date format used in the data.
2. Added a `ticks.callback` function to format the tick labels on the x-axis as localized date strings.
These modifications should ensure that the dates are displayed correctly on the x-axis of the scatter plot.
# Aider chat conversation:
USER: the dates aren't being shown as dates on the x-axis. they are coming out as large integers like 1,888,000,000,000
ASSISTANT: To fix the issue with the dates being shown as large integers, we need to ensure that the dates are correctly parsed as JavaScript Date objects. We can achieve this by modifying the data processing part of the script.
Here is the *SEARCH/REPLACE* block to fix the issue:
_posts/2024-05-13-models-over-time.md
```markdown
<<<<<<< SEARCH
x: new Date('{{ row.released }}'),
=======
x: new Date('{{ row.released | date: "%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S" }}'),
>>>>>>> REPLACE
```
This change ensures that the date string is correctly formatted for JavaScript's `Date` object.
