This commit is contained in:
Paul Gauthier 2023-05-13 12:38:49 -07:00
parent dc9fa48a07
commit e962ef2af1
3 changed files with 39 additions and 38 deletions

View file

@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ Notice that GPT-4 asks to see a particular source file, and aider automatically
## Chat transcript
> 2048$ aider
---
#### > what is this repo?
Based on the file names you provided, it seems like this repository is for a web-based game, possibly a 2048 game clone. The files include JavaScript files for game logic, HTML and CSS files for the user interface, and various meta files for icons and touch startup images.

View file

@ -1,16 +1,19 @@
# A complex multi-file change, with debugging
> This is a chat transcript of a fairly complex code change.
>
> The user is trying to update tests to use an input mock provided by prompt_toolkit. This requires changes to multiple source files.
>
> Aider's initial changes don't work, and the user provides error messages and doc snippets to collaboratively solve the problem.
This is a chat transcript of a fairly complex code change.
_Added tests/test_main.py to the chat_
_Added aider/getinput.py to the chat_
The user is trying to update tests to use an input mock provided by prompt_toolkit. This requires changes to multiple source files.
Aider's initial changes don't work, and the user provides error messages and doc snippets to collaboratively solve the problem.
## Chat transcript
> aider-repo$ aider
> Added tests/test_main.py to the chat
> Added aider/getinput.py to the chat
---
#### > instead of using /dev/null to send no output in the main tests, can we use the prompt_toolkit input mocking functions?
Yes, we can use the `prompt_toolkit.input` module to mock the input in the tests. Here's how to modify the `tests/test_main.py` file:
@ -97,25 +100,25 @@ tests/test_main.py
These changes will replace the usage of `/dev/null` with `prompt_toolkit`'s input mocking functions.
_Applied edit to tests/test_main.py_
_Applied edit to tests/test_main.py_
_Applied edit to tests/test_main.py_
_Applied edit to tests/test_main.py_
_Commit c177e29 aider: Replaced usage of /dev/null with prompt_toolkit's input mocking functions in tests._
> Applied edit to tests/test_main.py
> Applied edit to tests/test_main.py
> Applied edit to tests/test_main.py
> Applied edit to tests/test_main.py
> Commit c177e29 aider: Replaced usage of /dev/null with prompt_toolkit's input mocking functions in tests.
---
> Note: The user adds the main.py file to the chat. Also, the user made a small edit with their editor, outside the chat, and added a missing "import sys". Aider notices and helps commit this change.
#### > /add aider/main.py
_Git repo has uncommitted changes._
_Suggested commit message:
Added import statement for sys module in test_main.py._
_Commit before the chat proceeds [y/n/commit message]? Added import statement for sys module in test_main.py._
_Commit 6724fcd Added import statement for sys module in test_main.py._
> Git repo has uncommitted changes.
> Suggested commit message:
Added import statement for sys module in test_main.py.
> Commit before the chat proceeds [y/n/commit message]? Added import statement for sys module in test_main.py.
> Commit 6724fcd Added import statement for sys module in test_main.py.
_Added aider/main.py to the chat_
> Added aider/main.py to the chat
---
#### > I am getting this error: FAILED tests/test_main.py::TestMain::test_main_with_empty_git_dir_new_file - TypeError: main() got an unexpected keyword argument 'input'
@ -141,8 +144,8 @@ def main(args=None, input=None, output=None):
Now, the `main()` function will accept the `input` and `output` keyword arguments, and the tests should pass.
_Applied edit to aider/main.py_
_Commit 79dfba9 aider: Fixed main() function to accept input and output keyword arguments._
> Applied edit to aider/main.py
> Commit 79dfba9 aider: Fixed main() function to accept input and output keyword arguments.
---
#### > we need to pass those into InputOutput and to prompt_toolkit right?
@ -204,10 +207,10 @@ aider/main.py
These changes will ensure that the `input` and `output` arguments are passed to the `InputOutput` class and then to the `prompt_toolkit.prompt()` function.
_Applied edit to aider/getinput.py_
_Applied edit to aider/getinput.py_
_Applied edit to aider/main.py_
_Commit cea9d2a aider: Updated InputOutput class to accept input and output arguments and passed them to prompt_toolkit.prompt() function._
> Applied edit to aider/getinput.py
> Applied edit to aider/getinput.py
> Applied edit to aider/main.py
> Commit cea9d2a aider: Updated InputOutput class to accept input and output arguments and passed them to prompt_toolkit.prompt() function.
---
#### > FAILED tests/test_main.py::TestMain::test_main_with_empty_git_dir_new_file - TypeError: prompt() got an unexpected keyword argument 'input'
@ -229,8 +232,8 @@ aider/getinput.py
These changes will ensure that the `input` and `output` arguments are passed correctly to the `prompt_toolkit.prompt()` function.
_Applied edit to aider/getinput.py_
_Commit 55d3540 aider: Fixed `prompt()` function call in `get_input()` method to pass `stdin` and `stdout` arguments instead of `input` and `output`._
> Applied edit to aider/getinput.py
> Commit 55d3540 aider: Fixed `prompt()` function call in `get_input()` method to pass `stdin` and `stdout` arguments instead of `input` and `output`.
---
#### > prompt_toolkit.shortcuts.prompt(message: AnyFormattedText | None = None, *, history: History | None = None, editing_mode: EditingMode | None = None, refresh_interval: float | None = None, vi_mode: bool | None = None, lexer: Lexer | None = None, completer: Completer | None = None, complete_in_thread: bool | None = None, is_password: bool | None = None, key_bindings: KeyBindingsBase | None = None, bottom_toolbar: AnyFormattedText | None = None, style: BaseStyle | None = None, color_depth: ColorDepth | None = None, cursor: AnyCursorShapeConfig = None, include_default_pygments_style: FilterOrBool | None = None, style_transformation: StyleTransformation | None = None, swap_light_and_dark_colors: FilterOrBool | None = None, rprompt: AnyFormattedText | None = None, multiline: FilterOrBool | None = None, prompt_continuation: PromptContinuationText | None = None, wrap_lines: FilterOrBool | None = None, enable_history_search: FilterOrBool | None = None, search_ignore_case: FilterOrBool | None = None, complete_while_typing: FilterOrBool | None = None, validate_while_typing: FilterOrBool | None = None, complete_style: CompleteStyle | None = None, auto_suggest: AutoSuggest | None = None, validator: Validator | None = None, clipboard: Clipboard | None = None, mouse_support: FilterOrBool | None = None, input_processors: list[Processor] | None = None, placeholder: AnyFormattedText | None = None, reserve_space_for_menu: int | None = None, enable_system_prompt: FilterOrBool | None = None, enable_suspend: FilterOrBool | None = None, enable_open_in_editor: FilterOrBool | None = None, tempfile_suffix: str | Callable[[], str] | None = None, tempfile: str | Callable[[], str] | None = None, default: str = '', accept_default: bool = False, pre_run: Callable[[], None] | None = None) → str
@ -239,7 +242,7 @@ I apologize for the confusion earlier. It seems that the `prompt_toolkit.prompt(
First, import the necessary classes and functions from `prompt_tool
_^C KeyboardInterrupt_
> ^C KeyboardInterrupt_
> Note: The user interrupted the response, since it wasn't providing a useful solution
@ -291,9 +294,9 @@ aider/getinput.py
These changes will ensure that the `input` and `output` arguments are passed correctly to the `prompt_toolkit`'s `PromptSession` class.
_Applied edit to aider/getinput.py_
_Applied edit to aider/getinput.py_
_Commit ac92cca aider: Replaced `prompt()` with `PromptSession()` to correctly pass input and output arguments._
> Applied edit to aider/getinput.py
> Applied edit to aider/getinput.py
> Commit ac92cca aider: Replaced `prompt()` with `PromptSession()` to correctly pass input and output arguments.
---
#### > try using create_input(StringIO('')) in the tests
@ -346,11 +349,11 @@ tests/test_main.py
These changes will replace the usage of `create_pipe_input()` with `create_input(StringIO(''))` in the test cases.
_Applied edit to tests/test_main.py_
_Applied edit to tests/test_main.py_
_Applied edit to tests/test_main.py_
_Applied edit to tests/test_main.py_
_Commit 4bb043f aider: Replaced the usage of `create_pipe_input()` with `create_input(StringIO(''))` in the test cases._
> Applied edit to tests/test_main.py
> Applied edit to tests/test_main.py
> Applied edit to tests/test_main.py
> Applied edit to tests/test_main.py
> Commit 4bb043f aider: Replaced the usage of `create_pipe_input()` with `create_input(StringIO(''))` in the test cases.
---
#### > nice, that worked!

View file

@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ In this chat transcript, the user asks aider about the CSS Exercises repo https:
## Chat transcript
> css-exercises$ aider
---
#### > what is this repo?
Based on the file list provided, it seems like this repository contains a collection of CSS and HTML exercises, solutions, and examples. The exercises cover various topics such as Flexbox, Grid, Animation, Foundations, and Margin & Padding. The repository also includes images and other assets used in the exercises.