dearwolf/aider
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Aider-AI/aider.git synced 2025-05-30 17:24:59 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 3

copy

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Paul Gauthier 2024-06-01 06:21:04 -07:00
parent 7889a91e9d
commit 871bdc8c9a
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
_posts/2024-05-31-both-swe-bench.md
View file

@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ The SWE Bench acceptance testing just confirms that tests pass or fail
in the same pattern as the "gold patch" developed by a human to solve the
problem.
Some tests may fail during acceptance testing,
and that's ok as long they failed for the gold
and that's ok as long as they failed for the gold
patch too.
- There may have been pre-existing linting problems in the repo.
If lingering linting issues affected code paths that are not well tested,
@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ This was the case for both this main SWE Bench result and the
earlier Lite result.
The table below breaks down the benchmark outcome of each problem,
show whether aider with GPT-4o and with Opus
showing whether aider with GPT-4o and with Opus
produced plausible and/or correct solutions.
|Row|Aider<br>w/GPT-4o<br>solution<br>plausible?|Aider<br>w/GPT-4o<br>solution<br>resolved<br>issue?|Aider<br>w/Opus<br>solution<br>plausible?|Aider<br>w/Opus<br>solution<br>resolved<br>issue?|Number of<br>problems<br>with this<br>outcome|
@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ Table 2 of their
reports an `ACR-avg` result of 10.59% which is an average pass@1 result.
The results presented here for aider are all pass@1, as
the [official SWE Bench Lite leaderboard](https://www.swebench.com)
the [official SWE Bench leaderboard](https://www.swebench.com)
only accepts pass@1 results.