dearwolf/aider
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Aider-AI/aider.git synced 2025-05-24 22:34:59 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 9

copy

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Paul Gauthier 2023-12-19 14:59:55 -08:00
parent 3e639639d5
commit 837fd9e30b
1 changed files with 7 additions and 5 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

12
docs/unified-diffs.md
View file

@ -7,7 +7,9 @@
Aider now asks GPT-4 Turbo to use
[unified diffs](#choose-a-familiar-editing-format)
to edit your code.
This dramatically improves GPT-4 Turbo's performance on a complex benchmark
This dramatically improves GPT-4 Turbo's performance on a
challenging
new benchmark
and significantly reduces its bad habit of "lazy" coding,
where it writes
code with comments
@ -17,15 +19,15 @@ Aider also has a new "laziness" benchmark suite
designed to both provoke and quantify lazy coding.
It consists of
89 python refactoring tasks
which tend to make GPT-4 Turbo very lazy.
On these tasks it often produces comments like
which tend to make GPT-4 Turbo lazy
and write comments like
"...include the original method body...".
This new laziness benchmark produced the following results with `gpt-4-1106-preview`:
- **GPT-4 Turbo only scored 20% as a baseline** using aider's existing "SEARCH/REPLACE block" edit format. It output "lazy comments" on 12 of the tasks.
- **GPT-4 Turbo only scored 20% as a baseline** using aider's existing "SEARCH/REPLACE block" edit format. It outputs "lazy comments" on 12 of the tasks.
- **Aider's new unified diff edit format raised the score to 61%**. Using this format reduced laziness by 3X, with GPT-4 Turbo only using lazy comments on 4 of the tasks.
- **It's worse to prompt that the user is blind, without hands, will tip $2000 and fears truncated code trauma.** These widely circulated folk remedies performed worse on the benchmark when added to the system prompt for the baseline SEARCH/REPLACE and new unified diff editing formats. These prompts did *slightly* reduce the amount of laziness, but at a large cost to successful benchmark outcomes.
- **It's worse to prompt that the user is blind, without hands, will tip $2000 and fears truncated code trauma.** These widely circulated folk remedies performed worse on the benchmark when added to the system prompt for the baseline SEARCH/REPLACE and new unified diff editing formats. These prompts did slightly reduce the amount of laziness against baseline (to 8 lazy tasks). It increased the lazy tasks to 5 when added to the unified diff prompt.
The older `gpt-4-0613` also did better on the laziness benchmark using unified diffs: