dearwolf/aider
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Aider-AI/aider.git synced 2025-05-31 17:55:01 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 9

move into website/

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Paul Gauthier 2024-06-05 14:28:39 -07:00
parent 5a4d38418d
commit 56519361e2
103 changed files with 5 additions and 12 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

41
website/docs/benchmarks-0125.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
---
title: The January GPT-4 Turbo is lazier than the last version
excerpt: The new `gpt-4-0125-preview` model is quantiatively lazier at coding than previous GPT-4 versions, according to a new "laziness" benchmark.
highlight_image: /assets/benchmarks-0125.jpg
nav_exclude: true
---
# The January GPT-4 Turbo is lazier than the last version
[![benchmark results](/assets/benchmarks-0125.svg)](https://aider.chat/assets/benchmarks-0125.svg)
[OpenAI just released a new version of GPT-4 Turbo](https://openai.com/blog/new-embedding-models-and-api-updates).
This new model is intended to reduce the "laziness" that has been widely observed with the previous `gpt-4-1106-preview` model:
> Today, we are releasing an updated GPT-4 Turbo preview model, gpt-4-0125-preview. This model completes tasks like code generation more thoroughly than the previous preview model and is intended to reduce cases of “laziness” where the model doesn’t complete a task.
With that in mind, I've been benchmarking the new model using
aider's existing
[lazy coding benchmark](https://aider.chat/docs/unified-diffs.html).
## Benchmark results
Overall,
the new `gpt-4-0125-preview` model seems lazier
than the November `gpt-4-1106-preview` model:
- It gets worse benchmark scores when using the [unified diffs](https://aider.chat/docs/unified-diffs.html) code editing format.
- Using aider's older [SEARCH/REPLACE block](https://github.com/paul-gauthier/aider/blob/9033be74bf74ae70459013e54b2ae6a97c47c2e6/aider/coders/editblock_prompts.py#L75-L80) editing format, the new January model outperforms the older November model. But it still performs worse than both models using unified diffs.
## Related reports
This is one in a series of reports
that use the aider benchmarking suite to assess and compare the code
editing capabilities of OpenAI's GPT models.
You can review the other reports
for additional information:
- [GPT code editing benchmarks](https://aider.chat/docs/benchmarks.html) evaluates the March and June versions of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4.
- [Code editing benchmarks for OpenAI's "1106" models](https://aider.chat/docs/benchmarks-1106.html).
- [Aider's lazy coding benchmark](https://aider.chat/docs/unified-diffs.html).