From 3a119ff1b1d7d2664f84f6ec1c4e76cfa0f0340b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: paul-gauthier <69695708+paul-gauthier@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 12:24:43 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Update unified-diffs.md

---
 docs/unified-diffs.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/docs/unified-diffs.md b/docs/unified-diffs.md
index fe28fd8f5..015d87e4e 100644
--- a/docs/unified-diffs.md
+++ b/docs/unified-diffs.md
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ often resulting in comments like
 This new laziness benchmark produced the following results with `gpt-4-1106-preview`:
 
 - **GPT-4 Turbo only scored 15% as a baseline** using aider's existing "SEARCH/REPLACE block" edit format.
-- **Aider's new unified diff edit format raised the score to 65%**.
+- **Aider's new unified diff edit format raised the score to 62%**.
 - **No benefit from the user being blind, without hands, tipping $2000 or fearing truncated code trauma.** These widely circulated folk remedies performed no better than baseline when added to the system prompt with aider's SEARCH/REPLACE edit format. Including *all* of them still only scored at 15%
 
 The older `gpt-4-0613` also did better on the laziness benchmark using unified diffs: